Have you accounted for all your ‘make good’ and restoration provisions?

The implementation of IFRS 16 Leases for periods beginning 1 January 2019, as well as increasing shareholder interest about Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters, has highlighted that ‘make good’ and restoration provisions recognised in the balance sheets of lessees, oil and gas producers and other mining operators may often be incomplete or insufficient.

What is the difference between ‘make good’ and restoration provisions?

‘Make good’ and restoration provisions are essentially the same thing but ‘make good’ provisions usually refer to the obligation of a tenant (lessee) to return their rental premises to the landlord in a similar condition to when they moved in, whereas the term ‘restoration provision’ covers similar ‘make good’ obligations but is usually used for oil and gas and certain mining entities.

‘Make good’ provisions

Examples of ‘make good’ provisions include:

• If a tenant rents the premises as a shell, their ‘make good’ obligation could involve stripping all fixtures and fittings, removing staircases, and returning the premises to the landlord as a shell (sometimes also referred to as decommissioning obligations)
• If the tenant rents empty space that is carpeted and newly painted, their ‘make good’ obligation may require returning the premises with new carpet and a fresh coat of paint.

The introduction of IFRS 16 means regulators (such as the Financial Markets Authority (FMA)) now have greater visibility of the leasing activities of groups with a significant retail footprint, so they are in a better position to assess the adequacy of ‘make good’ provisions that must typically be settled in some form at the end of a lease. Such entities need to consider their ‘make good’ obligations in every single lease and provide for all obligations meeting the recognition and measurement criteria in IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.

Restoration provisions

Examples of restoration provisions include:

• Manufacturers required to cleanup environmental damage
• Exploration entities required to rectify land damage caused by drilling
• Oil and gas entities required to decommission and remove pipelines and infrastructure including any offshore and certain subsea infrastructure
• Mining entities required to decommission and rehabilitate a mine site at the end of the life of the mine.

Entities need to reassess whether they have adequately provided for all restoration obligations under IAS 37 because these are likely to be material.

When to recognise ‘make good’ and restoration provisions?

‘Make good’ and restoration provisions are recognised in accordance with IAS 37, paragraph 14, as follows:

It is therefore important to correctly identify the past event (obligating event) because this is what determines when the provision is recognised. An obligating event is one where the entity has no realistic alternative but to settle the obligation created by the past event, which can only occur if either:

• Settlement of the obligation can be enforced by law
• For constructive obligations, the event creates a valid expectation by other parties that the entity will discharge the obligation.

So, essentially, ‘make good’ and restoration provisions are recognised when the obligating event to rehabilitate property occurs, which is usually as and when the entity’s actions have damaged property. This is illustrated in the diagram below.

Recognising ‘make good’ and restoration provisions too early or too late can have a material impact on the financial statements. For example:

• If a mine fails to recognise its full decommissioning obligation as soon as the mine structure and equipment is constructed and installed on the property, provisions will likely be significantly understated.
• If a mine recognises upfront as a provision the full expected cost of rectifying environmental damage expected to occur to property over the life of the mine, provisions are likely to be significantly overstated.

ESG commitments do not necessarily result in restoration provisions

Some ESG commitments result in a restoration provision being recognised in the balance sheet and others not.

Need assistance?

Determining whether a ‘make good’ or restoration provision meets the recognition requirements in IAS 37 is not always easy. Judgement is often required to assess whether there is a present obligation as a result of a past event, i.e. identifying if there is an obligating event. Please contact BDO’s IFRS Advisory team if you require assistance.

For more on the above, please contact your local BDO representative.

---

This publication has been carefully prepared, but is general commentary only. This publication is not legal or financial advice and should not be relied upon as such. The information in this publication is subject to change at any time and therefore we give no assurance or warranty that the information is current when read. The publication cannot be relied upon to cover any specific situation and you should not act, or refrain from acting, upon the information contained therein without obtaining specific professional advice. Please contact the BDO member firms in New Zealand to discuss these matters in the context of your particular circumstances.
BDO New Zealand and each BDO member firm in New Zealand, their partners and/or directors, employees and agents do not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information contained in this article nor do they accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any loss arising from any action taken or not taken by anyone in reliance on the information in this publication or for any decision based on it, except in so far as any liability under statute cannot be excluded. Read full Disclaimer.